Since its beginning, LIDAR has changed the
course of technology thanks to the numerous advantages it provides. The data
processing options of LIDAR play a significant part in the results obtained. LIDAR
counts with different systems like EAARL, GIS, and IMA whose data processing options
bring advantages but also disadvantages to its users.
EAARL
and LIDAR
Experimental Advanced Airborne Research Lidar
(EAARL) is a light weight low-power sensor used on light aircrafts. Unfortunately, because of the unique nature
of the system, off-the-shelf software is not available for EAARL data processing,
feature extraction, and image display (Hansen, 2008). Another disadvantage of
EAARL according to Wright, lead investigator for
NASA's Experimental Advanced Airborne Research Lidar (EAARL) system at Wallops
Flight Facility on Virginia's eastern shore, is that “EAARL is uniquely able to
make measurements over ground that varies tremendously in reflectivity and
complexity.”
EAARL bright side is that compared to
other LIDAR’s that tune for either weak or strong signals, EAARL can capture them all because it makes frequent
measurements -- about four billion per second using multiple detectors (NASA,
2004). This trait makes it perfect for tracking hurricane damage in coastal
areas, which are made up of water, sand and plant life (NASA, 2004). Other
advantages of EAARL include its flexibility for charting storm damages, it does
not require to be re-calibrated for every project and every sort of terrain
(NASA, 2004).
GIS and
LIDAR
GIS is one of the most commercially available
software packages, it can be used to import and export LIDAR data. Unfortunately,
GIS is limited in the number of points that can be handled at any one time but
there is still hope (Barnwell, 2009). Many LiDAR practitioners have developed proprietary software to handle the data volumes, and commercial GIS and photogrammetric software
developers are beginning to address the problem
(Barnwell, 2009). GIS in future years will have the advantage of making easer
for service providers and clients alike to manipulate LIDAR data (Barnwell,
2009). Another advantage is that the data is acquired, processed and clients
alike to manipulate LIDAR data (Barnwell, 2009).
IMA and
LIDAR
Infrastructure Mapping and Autonomy (IMA),
has the advantage of leveraging infrastructure developed for Civil Maps
(Infrastructure Mapping, n.d.). This allows to process the data collected
swiftly and accurately when the processing of LIDAR data is time consuming and
hardware intensive (Infrastructure Mapping, n.d.). IMA benefits its customers
through:
·
faster data processing
·
lower data creation cost and higher ROI on LiDAR
·
detailed, highly accurate maps of project
areas
·
reduced landowner interaction
·
safe, secure and non-invasive data collection
·
rapid turnaround time with regular updates
·
easy asset inventorying and change detection
Sources
Barnwell, Charles. (2009). LiDAR for Terrain Mapping
on the Alaska Pipeline Corridor. Arlis. Retrieved
from http://www.arlis.org/docs/vol1/AlaskaGas/Paper/Paper_OFC_2009_LiDAR_TerrainMapping.pdf
Hansen,
Mark. n.d. Louisiana Barrier Island Comprehensive Monitoring Program. Pontchartrain Institute for Environmental
Sciences. Retrieved from https://www.lacoast.gov/reports/project/BICM4_part1-Lidar%20Systems%20and%20Data%20Processing%20Techniques.pdf
Infrastructure Mapping. n.d. Infrastructure Mapping
and Autonomy: A New Era in Mapping. Infrastructure
Mapping. Retrieved from https://www.infrastructuremapping.com/
NASA. (2004). LIDAR: In the Wake of the Storm. NASA. Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/missions/earth/f_lidar.html
Wright, Wayne. (2016). Depth Calibration and
Validation of the Experimental Advanced Airborne Research Lidar, EAARL-B. Coastal Education Research Foundation.
Retrieved from http://www.jcronline.org/doi/pdf/10.2112/SI76-00
No comments:
Post a Comment